In a threat/hazard analysis, which action is NOT appropriate?

In a threat/hazard analysis, utilizing a comprehensive and inclusive approach is essential for effectively identifying and mitigating risks. Selecting to rely solely on governmental organizations is not appropriate because it limits the diversity and breadth of perspectives necessary for a thorough analysis.

Community organizations, critical infrastructure owners, and nontraditional partners bring invaluable insights and data that enhance understanding of local vulnerabilities, capabilities, and risks. Engaging various stakeholders fosters collaboration, ensures that different viewpoints are considered, and ultimately leads to a more robust and actionable threat/hazard analysis. The integration of experiences and knowledge from a broad range of entities increases the resilience of the community and improves emergency management strategies. Thus, relying exclusively on governmental organizations undermines this critical collaborative aspect of effective emergency management.